By focusing on life skills, coaches can avoid losing athletes to private clubs, UND scholar writes in The Conversation
On March 19, The Conversation published an article authored by Mark Rerick, assistant professor of Kinesiology. The article describes the growing trend of high school athletes competing for private club teams rather than their school.
The article is below and can be read in its original form on The Conversation’s website. As of March 27, the article has been republished by 12 media outlets and read nearly 25,000 times, including by readers in the United States, Canada, France, Australia and the United Kingdom, among other countries.
The Conversation is a nonprofit media resource that publishes “explanatory journalism” stories by university scholars and makes those stories available for free and immediate republication. A complete list of all articles authored by UND scholars can be found on The Conversation’s website.
UND faculty members and graduate students who’d like more information on writing for The Conversation are invited to read Introducing The Conversation, a story that appeared in UND Today in 2022. An additional story from 2023, “More than 340,000 readers worldwide,” noted that UND faculty members who’ve written for The Conversation report “outstanding” experiences and say they’d recommend without hesitation that their colleagues become Conversation authors.
Questions? Please contact Tom Dennis, UND associate director of communications, at [email protected], or Adam Kurtz, UND strategic communication editor, at [email protected].
By Mark Rerick
Not long ago, high school students who wanted to play football, basketball or another sport had few options other than trying out for their school team. And it was to high school gymnasiums and fields that recruiters flocked to find talent for colleges and even the pros.
That’s changed in recent decades as private clubs have emerged and soared in popularity across the country. Today, kids interested in pretty much any sport often have multiple clubs and leagues to choose from instead of playing on their high school’s varsity squads. Clubs have been especially good at attracting the most talented student-athletes due to their intense and competitive nature.
As a result, parents are increasingly debating something that would have been unthinkable a couple of generations ago: Where should our kids play sports?
As a former K-12 director of athletics – and as a current parent of three youth athletes from elementary to the collegiate level – I know it can be a tough choice. I’ve seen firsthand the pros and cons of playing sports both in high school and clubs.
While clubs may be best for the most talented athletes, I believe schools can’t be beat for the broader focus they can put on character development. Since the vast majority of student-athletes won’t play in organized leagues beyond high school, that’s where I believe the schools’ focus should be.
My own unpublished research shows it’s also a way – along with emphasizing the fun and social aspects of athletics – to get more students who played sports as young kids to continue in high school.
The rise of the private youth sports industry
Although I am an unapologetic advocate for school-based athletics, I recognize the benefits that come along with participation in club or private-league programs.
But prior to the 1980s, private clubs weren’t common. Before high school, kids played on teams organized by their schools, local parks and recreation programs or nonprofit organizations such as the YMCA. After that, the only option for most was high school sports.
The first big step toward highly organized, privatized youth sports programs occurred during what has been referred to as “the Reagan revolution,” according to research I did for my dissertation. President Ronald Reagan’s funding cuts across the government pushed more expenses onto states and cities, which limited the ability of local parks and recreation departments to fully staff youth programs. This left many of them with only enough funds to maintain their facilities.
At the same time, school districts began systematically reducing the number of physical education classes offered in lieu of an increased focus on subjects such as math and science. Those two factors took away the most affordable options for athletic participation for many families.
With the reduction of public offerings, the youth sports programming gap was filled by private clubs and leagues, which placed more emphasis on athleticism, competition and sometimes elite-style training. And it’s become big business for the adults who run these programs.
While good numbers on these leagues are hard to come by, multiple data sources show the privatized youth sports market has experienced tremendous growth in recent years. A recent estimate put total spending on youth sports at over US$40 billion as of 2024, compared with the $10 billion estimate of the youth sports economy in 2010.
But despite their growth, one sobering statistic for aspiring elite athletes remains true: Only about 7% of teenagers who play organized sports will advance to the collegiate level or beyond.
Knowing that 93% of high school athletes will end their competitive careers at graduation, I believe it’s important that school administrators place a premium on running athletic programs that focus on building skills they’ll need as adults instead of just winning games.
Why most students play
My own research backs this up.
In my previous role as a director of athletics for public schools in Grand Forks, North Dakota, I routinely surveyed our athletes at the end of their seasons about various aspects of their experience on the team. Among those questions, I asked athletes to tell me the three most important reasons they chose to play that sport for that season and whether they were planning to play on the team again next year.
Unsurprisingly to me, the top three reasons were consistently to have fun, spend time with friends and stay physically active, in that order. You’ll notice winning games or for competition were not among them.
On the flip side, when asked why students chose to drop out the following year, the top reason was their relationship with the coach, while a close second was that they were not having fun. To me, this was evidence that what student-athletes most wanted from their high school programs wasn’t so much sport skills development as personal development and growth.
Other studies back this up. Overtraining and a lack of fun are cited as the main reasons why 70% of young athletes who compete on a team stop playing before they even reach high school.
Focus on the fun – not the competition
Here are five things school administrators can do to help turn things around and make their sports programs more attractive to students considering clubs, as well as those who are pondering giving up on sports altogether.
- Develop an athletic program that teaches character traits and life skills that are usable for 100% of participants, not just the 7% who go on to play in college.
- Make sure programs emphasize fun, social growth and physical fitness, rather than just the competition.
- Encourage coaches to spend individual time throughout the season with each student-athlete to discuss the athlete’s goals, role and progress.
- Survey student-athletes about their experience at the end of each season and tweak the program accordingly.
- Include student-athlete assessments about how much they enjoy playing for the coach as a part of the coach’s postseason evaluation.
High school sports may not be for everybody, but I believe many more students would choose to participate if the focus were on building character and having fun with friends, not winning trophies.
link